RADIOMICS AND
MACHINE LEARNING
METHODS FOR
COMPUTER-AIDED
PROSTATE CANCER
ASSESSMENT
Author: Pablo Laso-Mielgo
Supervisor: Norberto Malpica
Co-supervisor: Sergio Dominguez
Contents
Prostate cancer MRI and Previous
Studies.
Objectives.
Methodology.
Results.
Conclusions.
Future Implementations.
Prostate cancer
MRI and
Previous
Studies
Prostate cancer MRI
and Previous Studies
+27.6% PCa new cases by 2040.
Prostate cancer MRI
and Previous Studies
+27.6% PCa new cases by 2040.
Different CAD systems (lung nodules,
breast cancer, colon cancer, …).
Prostate cancer MRI
and Previous Studies
+27.6% PCa new cases by 2040.
Different CAD systems (lung nodules,
breast cancer, colon cancer, …).
T2, DWI, and ADC maps.
Prostate cancer MRI
and Previous Studies
+27.6% PCa new cases by 2040.
Different CAD systems (lung nodules, breast
cancer, colon cancer, …).
T2, DWI, and ADC maps.
Previous studies on PCa Radiomics suggest:
Low T2 efficiency.
mp-MRI (using different image modalities).
Feature selection methods (mRMR).
SVM, RF, and LR.
Objectives
Development of a Computer tool for
Prostate Cancer assessment (CS/CI).
Study complete PI-RADS (1-5)
classification feasibility.
Assess the efficiency of radiomics-driven
algorithms.
Find most relevant radiomics features.
Methodology
Image Acquisition and
Processing
Image Acquisition and Processing.
Segmentation
Registration
Feature Extraction.
Data Analysis and Processing.
Feature Selection.
Classifiers/models.
Methodology: Image Acquisition
and Processing
T2, DWI (1000s/mm2).
DWI (b=1000) + DWI (b=0) ADC
maps.
DICOM NIfTI.
Methodology: Image Acquisition
and Processing
T2, DWI (1000s/mm2).
DWI (b=1000) + DWI (b=0) ADC
maps.
DICOM NIfTI.
Methodology: Image Acquisition
and Processing
T2, DWI (1000s/mm2).
DWI (b=1000) + DWI (b=0) ADC
maps.
DICOM NIfTI.
Methodology: Segmentation
Manual Segmentation (>100 * 3).
Training Radiomics models.
Training CNNs *.
Automatic Segmentation *.
* MSc thesis (Sergio Domínguez)
Methodology: Registration
T2 → DWI/ADC mapping.
Python (affine matrix) or 3DSlicer.
Joint findings for both modalities (if same
lesion).
ITK-Snap
Python
Methodology: Feature Extraction
Python.
pyRadiomics.
Inputs:
.yaml file specify features.
Image.
Mask.
Output:
Feature matrix.
Methodology: Data Analysis and Processing
Methodology: Data Analysis and Processing
Methodology: Data Analysis and Processing
Methodology:
Data Analysis and Processing
Correlation matrix.
Highly correlated features.
Methodology: Feature Selection
Filters
Chi-squared.
ANOVA.
Pearson’s coeff.
Mutual Information.
Wrappers
LR, DT, RF, SVM, KNN, Bagging, and GBM.
Embedded
Lasso.
Ridge.
Dimensionality reduction
PCA.
ADC feature selection
T2 feature selection
Methodology: Classifiers
SVM.
LR.
RF.
Ridge.
KNN.
Bagging.
GBM.
ADC feature selection
T2 feature selection
Results
Modality-specific CS/CI
mp-MRI (t2w+DWI+ADC) CS/CI
PI-RADS (1-5)
CS/CI classification
using DWI only
CS/CI classification
using DWI only
DWI
CS/CI classification
using T2 only
CS/CI classification
using ADC only
CS/CI classification
using mp-MRI
CS/CI classification
using mp-MRI
CS/CI classification
using mp-MRI
PI-RADS (1-5)
classification
using mp-MRI
Conclusions
Conclusions
Complete radiomics pipeline for prostate cancer assessment in MRI studies.
Conclusions
Complete radiomics pipeline for prostate cancer assessment in MRI studies.
High scores for images from different MRI scanners.
Conclusions
Complete radiomics pipeline for prostate cancer assessment in MRI studies.
High scores for images from different MRI scanners.
DW images: most efficient in both mp-MRI and non-mp-MRI.
Conclusions
Complete radiomics pipeline for prostate cancer assessment in MRI studies.
High scores for images from different MRI scanners.
DW images: most efficient in both mp-MRI and non-mp-MRI.
ADC maps: higher accuracy after gamma correction.
Conclusions
Complete radiomics pipeline for prostate cancer assessment in MRI studies.
High scores for images from different MRI scanners.
DW images: most efficient in both mp-MRI and non-mp-MRI.
ADC maps: higher accuracy after gamma correction.
Top-ranked features: Gray values, Entropy, and Energy.
Conclusions
Complete radiomics pipeline for prostate cancer assessment in MRI studies.
High scores for images from different MRI scanners.
DW images: most efficient in both mp-MRI and non-mp-MRI.
ADC maps: higher accuracy after gamma correction.
Top-ranked features: Gray values, Entropy, and Energy.
New pyradiomics matrices: GLCM along with GLRLM, GLDM, NGTDM, GLSZM.
Conclusions
Complete radiomics pipeline for prostate cancer assessment in MRI studies.
High scores for images from different MRI scanners.
DW images: most efficient in both mp-MRI and non-mp-MRI.
ADC maps: higher accuracy after gamma correction.
Top-ranked features: Gray values, Entropy, and Energy.
New pyradiomics matrices: GLCM along with GLRLM, GLDM, NGTDM, GLSZM.
ML models: not only limited to SVM.
Conclusions
Complete radiomics pipeline for prostate cancer assessment in MRI studies.
High scores for images from different MRI scanners.
DW images: most efficient in both mp-MRI and non-mp-MRI.
ADC maps: higher accuracy after gamma correction.
Top-ranked features: Gray values, Entropy, and Energy.
New pyradiomics matrices: GLCM along with GLRLM, GLDM, NGTDM, GLSZM.
ML models: not only limited to SVM.
Complete PI-RADS classification: lower efficiency. Ambiguous (especially 3vs4-PIRADS).
Future Implementations
Future
Implementations
1400-b-valued DW images.
Future
Implementations
1400-b-valued DW images.
3D modalities, such as LAVA or DISCO.
.
Future
Implementations
1400-b-valued DW images.
3D modalities, such as LAVA or DISCO.
Professional segmentation and labelling.
Future
Implementations
1400-b-valued DW images.
3D modalities, such as LAVA or DISCO.
Professional segmentation and labelling.
Larger dataset (especially for a mp-MRI, 1-5
PI-RADS classification).
Thank you!
Author: Pablo Laso-Mielgo.
Tutor: Norberto Malpica-Gonzalez.
Cotutor: Sergio Domínguez-Rodríguez.